Get Divorced and move on plus Domestic Violence cases

Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. Edison, NJ 732-572-0500 To schedule a confidential consultation, call us. To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com 2053 Woodbridge Ave., Edison, NJ 08817

Showing posts with label 2C:25-29.1 Civil penalty for certain domestic violence offenders.. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2C:25-29.1 Civil penalty for certain domestic violence offenders.. Show all posts

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

2C:25-29.1 Civil penalty for certain domestic violence offenders.

2C:25-29.1  Civil penalty for certain domestic violence offenders.
1.In addition to any other disposition, any person found by the court in a final hearing pursuant to section 13 of P.L.1991, c.261 (C.2C:25-29) to have committed an act of domestic violence shall be ordered by the court to pay a civil penalty of at least $50, but not to exceed $500.  In imposing this civil penalty, the court shall  take into consideration the nature and degree of injury suffered by the victim. The court may waive the penalty in cases of extreme financial hardship.
Posted by Vercammen Law at 5:34 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: 2C:25-29.1 Civil penalty for certain domestic violence offenders.
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)

Followers

Blog Archive

  • ▼  2024 (6)
    • ▼  May (2)
      • Updated Domestic Violence Brochures
      • In DV, plaintiff here did not need to prove "cour...
    • ►  January (4)
  • ►  2023 (24)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (8)
    • ►  March (6)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2022 (7)
    • ►  November (6)
    • ►  July (1)
  • ►  2021 (21)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (7)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (4)
  • ►  2020 (10)
    • ►  December (2)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  June (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2019 (19)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2018 (13)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (4)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2017 (22)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2016 (23)
    • ►  December (4)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (3)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (6)
  • ►  2015 (119)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (35)
    • ►  September (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (55)
    • ►  January (14)
  • ►  2014 (39)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  May (12)
    • ►  April (6)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2013 (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2012 (30)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  July (22)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2011 (101)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (10)
    • ►  July (4)
    • ►  June (7)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  April (14)
    • ►  February (53)
    • ►  January (5)
  • ►  2010 (21)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  July (11)
    • ►  June (4)

About Me

Vercammen Law
View my complete profile
Simple theme. Powered by Blogger.