ANIL K. LALL VS. MONISHA SHIVANI
This appeal involves a parent's effort terminate a
grandparent's visitation, which had been allowed pursuant to a
consent order. We hold that a parent's rights, which the Court
recognized in Moriarty v. Bradt, 177 N.J. 84, 114-15 (2003), do
not empower a parent to terminate or modify a consent order
unilaterally. Rather, a request to modify or terminate
visitation by consent order must be considered in accordance
with the Lepis framework. That is, a parent must make a prima
facie showing of changed circumstances as would warrant relief.
If the parent vaults that threshold, the parent bears the burden
to show the modification or termination would not cause harm to
the child. Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. Edison, NJ 732-572-0500 To schedule a confidential consultation, call us. To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com 2053 Woodbridge Ave., Edison, NJ 08817
Sunday, December 11, 2016
ANIL K. LALL VS. MONISHA SHIVANI
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.