J.S. VS. D.S.
A-5742-14T2
Defendant appealed a domestic violence final restraining
order (FRO), claiming it was void upon entry – despite the
parties' settlement of matrimonial issues that included
defendant's consent to the FRO – because the judge did not find
an act of domestic violence had occurred. A few days before the
scheduled date for oral argument in this court, the parties
stipulated to a dismissal of the appeal that would allow for the
perpetuation of the FRO. Notwithstanding their agreement, the
court exercised its discretion, pursuant to Rule 2:8-2, and
determined that the interests of justice required a disposition
of the appeal's merits; the court vacated the FRO due to the
lack of a finding of domestic violence, reinstated the TRO, and
remanded for a final hearing. Kenneth Vercammen, Esq. Edison, NJ 732-572-0500 To schedule a confidential consultation, call us. To schedule a confidential consultation, email us at VercammenAppointments@NJlaws.com 2053 Woodbridge Ave., Edison, NJ 08817
Sunday, December 11, 2016
J.S. VS. D.S. A-5742-14T2
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.