J.T.S. v. J.S. FRO reversed where no harassment   

Plaintiff appealed the denial of his application for a TRO. The parties married in 2003, separated in 2020 and have a child. The divorce proceedings were contentious and included disputes over child custody and parenting time. Plaintiff sought a TRO and alleged defendant harassed him via the Family Wizard co-parenting program. Trial court found plaintiff had not established the predicate act of harassment because none of the acts cited rose to the level of harassment. Court agreed the record demonstrated a lack of credible evidence to support a finding of harassment. The email exchange plaintiff cited merely contained defendant's statement she had to cancel that day's parenting time. Plaintiff did not show defendant intended "to alarm or seriously annoy" him. source Daily Briefing August 02, 2022   A-2789-20